anyone whose childhood had any exposure to State child services can throw down a pack of horror stories to match this, p much
-
-
-
Replying to @listmouse @chaosprime
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ i mean, consistent, I suppose.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @palecur @chaosprime
#! Retweeted #!
i mean when a position comes down to this i personally would rethink it:https://twitter.com/gypsy_panther/status/1065273367782150145 …
#! added,
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @listmouse @palecur
much better to treat them as the property of a psychopathic bureaucracy with zero skin in the game to be sure
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime @palecur
I'm not sure whether to laugh at that take or to cringe.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @chaosprime @palecur
Idunno, I feel like supporting violent tyrants is a bit more of a cop move than supporting a semi-functioning democracy but you do you!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @listmouse @palecur
>minority single moms trying to get a job to support their kids >violent tyrants yeah ima do me
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime @palecur
> much better to treat them as the property of a psychopathic bureaucracy with zero skin in the game to be sure Yeah, that's totally what you were implying.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
no idea what point you think this makes what do you understand me to have been implying
-
-
Replying to @chaosprime @palecur
If you're calling the state psychopathic in a situation that they were being reasonable in, then the only way the take couldn't be intentionally incorrect is if you using it as a generalised statement against the state.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Now, if it's a generalisation, that means that all cases get included. And - shocker - some parents /are/ violent.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.