that is some difficult shit to follow but it sounds like the accused's position is that misogyny is prejudice + power and he has none and the woke counterposition is… probably that man *formally* means power even if one is a trans man and got no actual power out of the deal
the alternative being that prejudice alone counts as misogyny, which seems too retrograde ~theory~ wise to credit. the idea that we must regard power according to abstract categories instead of material conditions tracks with the level of wokeness, though