it'd be appreciated if you could (here, DM) expand on your thinking. two things seem possible: - our understandings are similar and compatible but points of reference and wording are causing issues - one of us is less informed re memory/learning and could benefit from a mindmeld
-
-
there is no natively evolved method for this, no. and, sadly, most methods we might exogenously employ simply trade time for intensity. toss-up at best whether that's wise the pain of course is bc (1) these are uberpatterns that are referenced in a large amount of any given read
-
and (2) the uberpatterns are about personal state/status/well-being/satisfaction/etc so they don't result in the data being useless or corrupted per se and there's nothing to trigger large reconsolidation, unlike if an actual error was detected
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
i'd say from synaptic pruning i took away a model of a brain starting off "unformatted" and then being "formatted" by learning, then neurogenesis (and ideally psychedelics) "reformatting" and restoring lost plasticity