maybe because 3 is a tool for dealing with your Dunbar group and 4 is a tool for dealing with your world and 5 is a tool for dealing with your set of possible worlds
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
The stages aren't real. They're useful but the ingroup immediately latched onto them and started applying them as a whole worldview. I don't think they can bear the epistemic load placed on them.
-
This but for every framework
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Totally. So good to be borg
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah I totally skipped 3.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Are the non-binary kids onto something? There's a lot of logic hashed out (3). WRT "set of all possible worlds" politics, this piece calling out individualist sciences rings most for me: https://thenewinquiry.com/podcast-out/ see also Snapchat's
@_reallifemagThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What if they are less "stages" and more "tool(sets of tools)" and all discussion pertaining to this matter is obscure devpsych equivalent of "hashtag vim sux, byotches" holywar
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.