The biggest thing with that is just that vegetarianism isn't at all miserable, honestly. It's just food. And you can definitely minimise your impact by avoiding companies like Nestle, who have a history of doing terrible things to people and animals alike.
-
-
Replying to @listmouse
oh if only mere vegetarianism were anything close to good enough
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
I mean, vegetarianism prevents you from having to deal with animals being killed for you to eat (& the gross bits of the process of food creation). Wasn't giving a solution for full eco-friendliness, but something's better than nothing & most people avoid fur already, etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @SatyreContraire @chaosprime
That's highly unlikely in most cases. Not to mention, I mean, eating beef is, again, literally against the point of vegetarianism. Also do people actually use mice traps? I've never seen a mouse unless it was in a tiny cage.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SatyreContraire @chaosprime
I was talking about for personal usage. I'm aware of its usage in farming. Worth noting, too, small rodents and birds are - generally speaking - considered less important than more intelligent animals by most. Most of it is about /minimisation/ of harm, though.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Easy solution need to breed incredibly dumb and unselfaware cattle
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
:thinjking:
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
first step toward the Restaurant At The End Of The Universe solution
-
-
delicious p-zombie burger, guaranteed 100% qualia-free
0 replies 3 retweets 10 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.