all that seems super sensible to me, what i don't get is how, if you grant a moral value to animals living or dying and therefore we should be nice to them because milquetoast values etc, the extremist PETA-skipping-the-hypocrisy position is wrong
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
fair, but there's a card being palmed about the nature of necessity and whether it exists separately from volition. like, in your original example, the "necessity" of eating meat if no vegetables are available is up in the air; you could choose to die instead of eating meat
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
it isn't that you *have* to eat the meat, it's that you want to live more than you want to honor the value of the animal getting to live. i want to have a nice hamburger more than i want to honor the value of the animal getting to live. degree, not kind
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
np i did stuff too :)
7:44 PM - 2 Dec 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.