there may be outlier cases i'm not aware of, but i've never personally known "tag and fix" to be used for copyvio that has been determined to be copyvio after inspection; you delete the offending material and notability doesn't enter into it
okay. my experience was more that if you include two reliable source citations you'll be okay and if you don't you're straight up rolling the dice with very little in the way of roll modifiers, but idk. you participating in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Countering_systemic_bias …?
-
-
Nope. I mostly roll through US Supreme Court articles and copyright-related stuff and run into a bunch of peeps who use the rules as a stonewall for their opinions. But I used to edit Wookieepedia, so I was used to nonsense. Most people don't get it, and they shouldn't have to.
-
*nodnod* tendentious editing? in *my* Wikipedia? (it's more likely than you think!) i have a grudge against that Wikiproject because they didn't want to help me when people were trying to get the title Sephiroth to go to the goddamn Squenix character, but they might help you
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.