All I'm saying is that someone deleted one of few women to have won a physics Nobel Prize, an obviously notable figure per WP's other guidelines, and the article was given less time to work through its issues than any of the things on that list which has some entries from 2014.
which is not to say that asking "are there feasible ways we could tweak process to avoid creating the *appearance* of bias that some people perceived in this situation?" is unreasonable
-
-
I would and do make the claim that it is used disproportionately and "speedier" against minority topics because, in my WP experience, that is overwhelmingly what WP rules lawyering results in. But talking general improvement is a more palatable approach.
-
okay. my experience was more that if you include two reliable source citations you'll be okay and if you don't you're straight up rolling the dice with very little in the way of roll modifiers, but idk. you participating in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Countering_systemic_bias …?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.