Even copyvio is not a hard rule for article deletion. Might be interesting to look for patterns in what articles are allowed to exist with copyvio. No, I'm not saying these 600 articles compares to the torrent of all incoming copypasta. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category%3AAll_copied_and_pasted_articles_and_sections …
1) legal opinions vary 2) it's called a criterion for *speedy* deletion for a reason. anyway, these are things you can argue should be the way it's done, but they're *not* the way it's done, and it's not reasonable to expect the admin to suddenly have started doing it this way
-
-
like, these are arguments suitable for the Village Pump, not Monday morning quarterbacking aimed at identifying systemic bias for pillory
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1) They don't tho. One copyvio article existing for a day wouldn't threaten the project any more than 600 over 4 years. 2) I agree, but it was a bad end. It's important to point out why & how to improve. Arguing from "the way its done" gives undue weight to current bad practice.
-
1) "other problems exist in an unsolved state" is not a very a good argument for "let's not solve this problem". 2) enh, Chesterton's Fence, but sure, if process can reasonably be made better, argue for it
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.