Eh. Neither would cause a speedy deletion of a new article on Sam Harris. I agree deleted articles that result in news can be that way, but they get news because the Wiki mindset that uses rules to short-circuit critical thinking is bad and insular in a way alien to most people.
sure, and that's largely how it goes down. copyvio 1) potentially threatens the integrity of the whole project and 2) reflects zero damn effort from the contributor, though, so it's not handled the same way as an honest noob attempt
-
-
and the second article was a draft, so literally a thing that exists to solicit feedback on whether it's good enough to go in or not, which it wasn't, and it was declined with feedback indicating what it needed, which is exactly what should happen by both of our lights
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1) No it doesn't, as the worst thing that could happen is a takedown request that would be complied with anyway. 2) That is unnecessary hostility that leads to unnecessary haste. It should be treated like any other rule violation by a new editor.
-
1) legal opinions vary 2) it's called a criterion for *speedy* deletion for a reason. anyway, these are things you can argue should be the way it's done, but they're *not* the way it's done, and it's not reasonable to expect the admin to suddenly have started doing it this way
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.