The adage of the open source movement is "given enough eyes all bugs are shallow". But in content curation, the downside might be "given enough editors, all biases are extreme." Here's a simple calculation for @WikiResearch—
i'm really not. the first event, speedy deletion as copyright violation, was unambiguously correct (your interpretation of that as being about an image is a misread; the speedy deletion criterion cited would be invoked because the *entire article* was substantively her OSA page)
-
-
the second event was a deletion of an article because it failed to include independent reliable source citations, which is extremely ordinary, if not a faultless event (many inclusionist editors like myself get irritated when people use deletion as a way of demanding citations)
-
from there followed a lot of discussion, a lot of interpretation, a lot of misinterpretation, a lot of correction of misinterpretation. nothing a bit surprising about it, and none of it to do with anyone's personal interpretation of Donna Strickland as a notable topic
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.