A method.
the hybrid terms get right to it, though, don't they? it isn't one discipline providing the answers so another doesn't have to, it's one discipline informing another. which neuroscience can tremendously do for epistemology, absolutely
-
-
i don't think our epistemic questions having neuroscience-informed answers is anything but obvious, it's our epistemic questions having *neuroscience answers* that raises my eyebrow
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Typically when a hard science starts answering philosophical questions, it subsumes that discipline.
-
what are the cases of this occurring that you are drawing this typicality from?
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.