Ok now I have to spend a week thinking about what's most important to me with regards to magic; before thinking my intuition says it's to steer away from anything that makes it science, it's acausal & paracausal, and I want to lean as far back into the history of 'magic' as I can
-
-
In one form yes but you might also be asking for paracausal intervention from outside causality (dank demon summoning)
-
(Though I do agree even that is rooted in animism at its core)
-
Especially since I think our belief sysyems originated when we applied our human subjective internal state simulator we evolved as social apes to volcanoes and the sky ("oh. Volcano ANGRY.")
-
and anything else that demonstrates kinesis on its own
-
the basis of magic in http://lostsouls.org , on the other hand, is the idea that the underlying structure of reality is programmable, mostly by apophenia sufficiently intense as to qualify as a psychotic break sustained and systematized for years
-
I think this is awesome but also ultimately is a clarkeian causal system, which has much more representation than "what if legit paracausality and spaceships"
-
yeah, it is nailing it down, at the end of the day, just trying to keep the place where it's nailed down obscure (99.99% of magicians have no idea why anything they do works) what's paracausality mean to you?
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.