"Do you support violent revolution?" You know what? I'm really tired of those who justify, or at best are silent about, the legalized execution of workers by bomb or policeman wagging their moralizing fingers about the masses using violence to defend themselves. Bugger off.
do we conceive of a right to, what, have the world around one not have war in it? that's a negative. if we conceive of a right to *live* in a world without war that gets stickier
-
-
In practice, then, I believe more and more things (positive and negative) have become generally accepted as "human rights." We even have a word for someone who thinks this is bad: reactionary. +
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Revolutionary upheavals are caused by the desire of the masses to defend what they have, that they perceive is being taken away. They then often find themselves forced to carry forward positive rights (ie, the "right" of the capitalist to appropriate the landlord's holdings).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Authoritarianism" always comes in, at least in a revolution that means business, in order for the new class to protect itself from counter-revolution. This authoritarianism is always relaxed as the new ruling class no longer feels itself threatened. Then returns as needed.
-
yeah, that's basically the thing, i'm pretty sure the complexity of the system of the world is way beyond authoritarian management to any meaningful depth at this point, meaning that a revolution would automatically fuck things up to the point of epic genocide
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.