My impression is being understaffed for QA is common because people who know how to do it well find it boring.
-
-
-
pretty sure that's a thing, yes. the way you make QA performable despite that is automated testing. fun fact? the degree to which performing manual QA testing prepares somebody for the *software development* task of creating automated testing is precisely nil
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.