but why
-
-
-
when rabbis argue Talmud, their objective is to preserve ambiguity in interpretation, because ambiguity allows choice. when there's no more ambiguity, there are no more options
-
victory might destroy choice but forbidding victory seems to do so as well
-
yeah, that's not really the kind of equilibrium i'm trying to get at, not so much forbidding victory as enabling it and limiting its scope
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Rushing to actions alb. preconceived notion of "ethical superiority" and indeed "lasting techno-political victories", ignoring infinitely undefined moral ambiguities for money/freedom, even silencing them... Yeah that seems to be the nemesis of our human race.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
bad bc corp Right figured this out first, with FB/Twitter part of corp Right. . .
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.