pretty sure his premise is that writing off people's lives as being nearly worthless is inhumane and pattern matches to past ideologies that resulted in catastrophes
the game theoretic optimum position for the boundary between valued life and unvalued life is one that delineates the smallest possible group that includes oneself and can defeat a proportion of attempts by other groups to treat it as unvalued life defined by one's risk tolerance
-
-
i would prefer at least six nines of invincibility but maybe y'all wanna live dangerously
-
probably the best reason for veganism would be a preemptive defensive rhetorical attempt to convince nonhuman lifeforms that an extremely inclusive decision plane here is beneficial. relies on nonhuman lifeforms being stupid but why should they be any different
-
If nonhuman lifeforms treat universal (explicit) knowledge-creators as people (as arguably they will), then this is in the bag.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.