which is more destructive to accurate understanding of the world, “whatever our team uses to advance itself is true” discourse or “whatever the other team uses against our team is false” discourse?
-
-
Closer to ‘actually we have a pretty robust epistemic handle on a lot of important concepts, but I’m going to bad-faith pretend there is always at least some merit on both sides of the argument’
-
yeah that's fair, pretending that controversy existing means everybody has some kind of supportable position doesn't help anything
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.