which is more destructive to accurate understanding of the world, “whatever our team uses to advance itself is true” discourse or “whatever the other team uses against our team is false” discourse?
-
Show this thread
-
these are great results because my hot take is that the correct answer is option 2. you at least have the option of trying to shape your own team's discourse to be less bullshit; requiring outgroup claims to all be false forces you into a reactive stance you aren't in control of
5 replies 1 retweet 12 likesShow this thread -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.