weird how we didn't have to destroy free expression norms to accomplish that
-
-
Replying to @neuralculture
and to be sure if there's anything that will shut down the full scale activities of a duly authorized agency of the United States federal government, it's annihilating the idea that people get to talk so that we're protected from two dozen swastika-waving losers three states over
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @neuralculture
yeah, you bet! now some people would've thought that, in the face of government goons who don't need speech to carry out their program because they already have power, we might need *stronger* free speech norms so saying "abolish ICE" doesn't become prosecutable as treason
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chaosprime
but i'm glad you're too clever to have fallen into that trap and have instead chosen to mock the concept with the whole "freeze peach" thing. keep up the good work!
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @neuralculture
absolutely, i definitely embrace this position that i have nowhere stated despite its seeming idiocy since i consider it impossible for the same norm to protect two parties unless those two parties are exactly the same
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
oh to be sure we deserve equal credit for pursuing that fruitful line of inquiry
-
-
Replying to @neuralculture @chaosprime
wew lads, i really have enjoyed this dialogue. I think dril has the last laugh. But I also have to admit, I lost it at "_fruitful_ line of inquiry".
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.