so your argument against compatibilism is basically "no u"?
-
-
the reason is "the soul wants to," that's not acausal, that's literally an expression of will as the cause.
-
either the soul wants to for a reason, in which case determinism, or the soul wants to for no reason, in which case acausality, neither of which is free will
-
reasons aren't determinism any more than "because this is my will" is acausal, though.
-
"for a reason" in the causality sense, not the self-narrativization sense if there's an alternative to the soul's wants, or the person's because there is actually no necessity to be talking about souls here at all, being either caused or uncaused i'd love to hear about it
-
self-caused; yes, this is mystical and yes, i'm totes ok with that
-
okay. to me, that sort of thing is for rolling up the sleeves and altering the world time, not for trying to understand what the fuck is actually going on time
-
Fair; not the way I'd handle it, but understandable.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.