+ even though i'm favourable to libertarian free will, i don't think there are really any good arguments against compatibilism
-
-
ok whatever makes you feel better about dismissing large hosts of philosophical work you haven't read
-
i don't have to read everything Piers Anthony has ever written to know that he's crap. if these numbnuts motherfuckers had come up with a usable definition of free will that's neither "casuality but let's pretend" nor acausality you would have brought it up by now tbqf
-
i'm not even talking about "everything". just at least some of it
-
you're just throwing edgy rhetoric all over the place and dismissing half-understood ideas you refuse to get more acquainted with
-
or possibly i actually studied philosophy beyond the 100 level and have a lot of frustration with the gigantic nodes of bullshit still embedded in it
-
as far as refusing to get more acquainted with things, the primary metastatic mode of continental philosophy is leading you down the garden path with so much bullshit you forget your own name and buy into it just out of sunk costs, so yeah, i refuse sometimes
-
Tweet unavailable
-
what, the "if people have this property we're not going to define, then necessarily fundamental particles have it, and now everybody is going to use this to baselessly assert that Real Smart Scientists proved free will exists" theorem? i mean, the question is what it should do
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.