And by "meaning is not revealed" are you implying the nihilist is a (fallible) "creator of meaning", rather than a "denier of meaning" (in the Nietzschean sense)? "Annihilist" doesn't exactly encompass "denier of meaning", which leaves us using the colloquial "nihilist".
-
-
-
I like your usage, though. Don't get me wrong- just interrogating the idea.
-
it's not that yon nihilist is uniquely a fallible creator of meaning so much as considering themself and everyone else that, but yeah like that the right word for Nietschean "deniers of meaning" is probably "hecklers" the proposed annihilist is active where they are passive
-
The following is not an objection: This leaves Nietzsche in the crossfire of this idea. His idol-striking-hammer could be *mistaken* for a bit of annihilism. Perhaps there is a bit of creative-annhihilism going on there? A bit of the old "Refutation Enables Conjecture"?
-
oh sure, your annihilist doesn't want to make things
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
annihilist antinatalist analizer 2000
-
these are a few of my favorite things
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
sure, all i'm protesting is the identification of omniclastic impulse as nihilistic
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I like this. A third addition to Nietzsche's distinction between passive nihilist (lazy last man) and active nihilist (creates their own meaning). Your annihilist is a “destructive nihilist” who attacks existence to destroy any potentiality of meaning for themselves and others.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.