rubbish
-
-
Replying to @0xdeadbabe
a lot of people believe in single point of return i was really happy when the term "guard clauses" was invented, since it's impossible to defend any practice unless there's a trendy buzzword for it
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
single point of return is nonsense when you have to nest sixteen times to fuckery in order to achieve it
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @puellavulnerata @chaosprime
i still don't understand what the tangible benefit of S.P.O.R. is
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @puellavulnerata @0xdeadbabe
when single point of return does something important it's about making sure that everything that setup has happened for also gets teardown, 's more important in languages where you do a lot of managing of transient resources which everything ~modern~ is designed to avoid
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
a lot of the time single point of return advocacy is basically "hey guys i found the embedded systems dev"
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
so yeah the two-point-of-return-with-cleanup pattern is addressing the core concern
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.