It's not often that I retweet the US president, but he tweeted this image of the Iranian Safir launch failure. The image is very interesting as evidence suggests that it was taken by a US spy satellite on August 29th, 2019. Here's my analysis. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1167493371973255170 …
-
-
This resolution is for a range of 382 km. The perigee of Keyhole satellites like USA 224 is around 260 km, so the theoretical resolution could be a factor 1.5 better.
Show this thread -
One open question is whether USA 224 observed the El Khomeini Spaceport to track the Safir launch preparations, or to check the aftermath of the failure? Do we know when the failure happened? It must have been before 09:44UTC...
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The tweeted one appears to be a SWIR image to me.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Hmm. 10 cm at 382 km is right at the diffraction limit for a 2.4 m aperture. Any sharper would require a larger mirror.
-
Yep. For green light, talking ~0.05 arc seconds (in practice, Hubble with the same sized mirror only does ~0.1 arc seconds). 10 cm at 382 km is 0.054 arc seconds.https://twitter.com/Gergyl/status/1116099706768150528?s=20 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
If the US wanted to risk flying another stealth drone over Iran, surehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93U.S._RQ-170_incident …
End of conversation
-
-
-
The pixels in this are the pixels of the cell camera that took the photo, though, not the pixels of the original image
-
That's just what I thought. You have to look at the real information in it to determine the real resolution. Just like in handy cams. Tiny sensors, very low pixel pitch so small, the tiny lenses have no way of delivering an adequately sharp image to capture.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.