Preskoči na sadržaj
Korištenjem servisa na Twitteru pristajete na korištenje kolačića. Twitter i partneri rade globalno te koriste kolačiće za analize, personalizaciju i oglase.

Za najbolje sučelje na Twitteru koristite Microsoft Edge ili instalirajte aplikaciju Twitter iz trgovine Microsoft Store.

  • Naslovnica Naslovnica Naslovnica, trenutna stranica.
  • O Twitteru

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Jezik: Hrvatski
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • Ελληνικά
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Imate račun? Prijava
    Imate račun?
    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?

    Novi ste na Twitteru?
    Registrirajte se
Profil korisnika/ce cfiesler
Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD
Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD
Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD
@cfiesler

Tweets

Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD

@cfiesler

Faculty in @CUinfoscience by way of @gtcomputing & @vanderbiltlaw. Social computing, law, ethics, fandom. Max level geek. She/her. Views/opinions my own!

Boulder, CO
caseyfiesler.com
Vrijeme pridruživanja: rujan 2010.

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • O Twitteru
  • Centar za pomoć
  • Uvjeti
  • Pravila o privatnosti
  • Imprint
  • Kolačići
  • Informacije o oglasima
Odbaci
Prethodni
Sljedeće

Idite na profil osobe

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @

Odjava

Blokiraj

  • Objavi Tweet s lokacijom

    U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više

    Vaši popisi

    Izradi novi popis


    Manje od 100 znakova, neobavezno

    Privatnost

    Kopiraj vezu u tweet

    Ugradi ovaj Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Dodajte ovaj Tweet na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Dodajte ovaj videozapis na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Hm, došlo je do problema prilikom povezivanja s poslužiteljem.

    Integracijom Twitterova sadržaja u svoje web-mjesto ili aplikaciju prihvaćate Twitterov Ugovor za programere i Pravila za programere.

    Pregled

    Razlog prikaza oglasa

    Prijavi se na Twitter

    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?
    Nemate račun? Registrirajte se »

    Prijavite se na Twitter

    Niste na Twitteru? Registrirajte se, uključite se u stvari koje vas zanimaju, i dobivajte promjene čim se dogode.

    Registrirajte se
    Imate račun? Prijava »

    Dvosmjerni (slanje i primanje) kratki kodovi:

    Država Kod Samo za korisnike
    Sjedinjene Američke Države 40404 (bilo koje)
    Kanada 21212 (bilo koje)
    Ujedinjeno Kraljevstvo 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Irska 51210 Vodafone, O2
    Indija 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonezija 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italija 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » Pogledajte SMS kratke šifre za druge zemlje

    Potvrda

     

    Dobro došli kući!

    Vremenska crta mjesto je na kojem ćete provesti najviše vremena i bez odgode dobivati novosti o svemu što vam je važno.

    Tweetovi vam ne valjaju?

    Prijeđite pokazivačem preko slike profila pa kliknite gumb Pratim da biste prestali pratiti neki račun.

    Kažite mnogo uz malo riječi

    Kada vidite Tweet koji volite, dodirnite srce – to osobi koja ga je napisala daje do znanja da vam se sviđa.

    Proširite glas

    Najbolji je način da podijelite nečiji Tweet s osobama koje vas prate prosljeđivanje. Dodirnite ikonu da biste smjesta poslali.

    Pridruži se razgovoru

    Pomoću odgovora dodajte sve što mislite o nekom tweetu. Pronađite temu koja vam je važna i uključite se.

    Saznajte najnovije vijesti

    Bez odgode pogledajte o čemu ljudi razgovaraju.

    Pratite više onoga što vam se sviđa

    Pratite više računa da biste dobivali novosti o temama do kojih vam je stalo.

    Saznajte što se događa

    Bez odgode pogledajte najnovije razgovore o bilo kojoj temi.

    Ne propustite nijedan aktualni događaj

    Bez odgode pratite kako se razvijaju događaji koje pratite.

    Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD‏ @cfiesler 19. pro 2019.
    • Prijavi Tweet

    "[Open access] would effectively nationalize... intellectual property that we produce and force us to give it away to the rest of the world for free." In contrast to scholars who do the work giving away their intellectual property for free to publishers?https://newsroom.publishers.org/researchers-and-publishers-oppose-immediate-free-distribution-of-peer-reviewed-journal-articles/?fbclid=IwAR3u-5XyES1_21r_Lvi9_tbsvPENQHT5spWQlHGmW4hQhTaXWCeaA2iLMss …

    06:10 - 19. pro 2019.
    • 105 proslijeđenih tweetova
    • 269 oznaka „sviđa mi se”
    • Words Words Words Neal McBurnett fred adler Olivier Schulbaum CJ Valasek Emanuel Moss Paolo G. Giarrusso Robin DeRosa Matthias Fassl 🐊
    14 replies 105 proslijeđenih tweetova 269 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      1. Novi razgovor
      2. Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD‏ @cfiesler 19. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        This letter is not a good look. I am disappointed to see @TheOfficialACM as a signatory. I'm not saying that publishers add no value, but "Americans need to lock up their science so the rest of the world can't benefit" is not the right argument.

        6 replies 31 proslijeđeni tweet 152 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      3. Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD‏ @cfiesler 19. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        I’ve really been trying to keep ACM out of my increasing “burn it all down” attitude re: for-profit academic publishing, but wow, way to side with the Empire.

        1 proslijeđeni tweet 62 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      4. Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD‏ @cfiesler 19. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        A provocation: What might it look like for other disciplines of academic publishing to move to something that looks like the law review model? i.e., journals housed within university departments, with students engaged with editorial work for credit/prestige. [Thread]

        1 reply 6 proslijeđenih tweetova 35 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      5. Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD‏ @cfiesler 19. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        A huge amount of labor done for publishers (editorial work, peer review) is already free from academics, including students. Not suggesting that other disciplines move to cite-checking instead of peer review, but I don't see why students couldn't oversee finding reviewers, etc.

        1 reply 7 proslijeđenih tweetova 28 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      6. Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD‏ @cfiesler 19. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        For some publishers (e.g., ACM), authors already do their own formatting, so that wouldn't even be additional labor or cost. And with physical printing no longer required, I'm guessing the major expense is admin support + hosting, maybe physical space?

        0 proslijeđenih tweetova 17 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      7. Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD‏ @cfiesler 19. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Having journals associated with universities provides instant credibility, which might help with anxiety over publishers "owning" reputation currently associated with journals, which is part of what's causing this game of chicken re: moving away from the big publishers.

        0 proslijeđenih tweetova 14 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      8. Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD‏ @cfiesler 19. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Maybe I'm missing something, but aside from coordination-based "switching costs" (which, yes, are substantial), I don't see obvious downsides to this model compared to the current for-profit publisher model. Curious about others' thoughts!

        0 proslijeđenih tweetova 13 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      9. Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD‏ @cfiesler 19. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        One of my plans post-tenure was to increase my ACM service, possibly in the area of publications b/c of my strong feelings (and knowledge) about copyright. But hearing that the pubs board was not involved in this decision makes me think that would not be a good use of my time. :(

        5 replies 1 proslijeđeni tweet 26 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      10. Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD‏ @cfiesler 19. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        I love that in the middle of conversations about the sad plight of for-profit publishers (whose intellectual property is in JEOPARDY!) there is an article about how academics are doing the free labor of peer review on Christmas.https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/18/science/scientists-holiday-work.html …

        9 proslijeđenih tweetova 47 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      11. Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD‏ @cfiesler 20. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD je proslijedio/a tweet korisnika/ceVM

        I know we shouldn't feed the trolls but if anyone is bored and feels like engaging with this feel free!https://twitter.com/VM16391974/status/1208080296949751809 …

        Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD je dodan/na,

        VM @VM16391974
        "Scientific publishers must work to validate my status (and raise my income) as a scholar, but they don't deserve to get paid for it. Bacause unlike me-the-Ph.D., the peasants at ACM don't need to eat." https://twitter.com/cfiesler/status/1207664399252475904 …
        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      12. Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD‏ @cfiesler 20. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        As a reminder to everyone, ACM might have sided with the Empire on this one, but it is still a non-profit, and publishing proceeds help run conferences, etc. However, Elsevier makes billions of dollars a year based on the free labor of academics.https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science …

        1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 7 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      13. Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD‏ @cfiesler 20. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        An explanation of the for-profit scientific publishing business model: duck the costs of traditional publishing by not paying reviewers, editors, or authors, then sell the work back to those same people.pic.twitter.com/v50kflW1YM

        1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 9 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      14. Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD‏ @cfiesler 20. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        ACM, on the other hand, is an example of a more reasonable actor in this space, with okay OA policies. I also think that if more work were OA there are alternate business models. (e.g., I would encourage continuing to pay for the ACM DL b/c it's an invaluable search tool.)

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      15. Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD‏ @cfiesler 20. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        For companies that are making billions of dollars based on this business model, though, I have no sympathy. This is why it's so disappointing to see ACM take their side with a trash nationalist argument. I continue to hope they have some reasonable explanation for this.

        1 proslijeđeni tweet 7 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      16. Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD‏ @cfiesler 20. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD je proslijedio/a tweet korisnika/ceAssociation for Computing Machinery

        Response. ACM has a point about due process. Unfortunately the letter that has people so upset did not say 'we are concerned about the lack of due process.' It said 'more open access will result in other countries stealing America's intellectual property.'https://twitter.com/TheOfficialACM/status/1208141244075069440 …

        Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD je dodan/na,

        Association for Computing Machinery @TheOfficialACM
        Read more about the context and rationale behind ACM’s decision to sign letters in opposition to the OSTP zero embargo proposal: http://bit.ly/34DwFAM  pic.twitter.com/9ucByp3icR
        6 proslijeđenih tweetova 15 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      17. Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD‏ @cfiesler 20. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        This paragraph in @TheOfficialACM's response I think is important to remember. These efforts towards OA are the reason that I am perfectly comfortable publishing with ACM. But unless they literally did not read that letter before agreeing to sign, I don't see how it's defensible.pic.twitter.com/2GVPSnxWE0

        1 proslijeđeni tweet 14 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      18. Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD‏ @cfiesler 23. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        FYI: Currently involved with some folks in drafting a letter to ACM from its membership. If there are any similar initiatives please let me know so we can coordinate!

        7 proslijeđenih tweetova 25 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      19. Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD‏ @cfiesler 23. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        (Clarification: for ACM members to sign if they choose. Obviously would not write a letter on everyone’s behalf, who would do that ;) )

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 7 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      20. Kraj razgovora

    Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

    Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

      Sponzorirani tweet

      false

      • © 2020 Twitter
      • O Twitteru
      • Centar za pomoć
      • Uvjeti
      • Pravila o privatnosti
      • Imprint
      • Kolačići
      • Informacije o oglasima