So Catherine Millet (along with other privileged white women) has doubled down on her earlier remarks, citing a new wave of 'puritanism' on the part of women who don't want to be sexually harassed anymore.
-
-
And how terrifying that they are actually using misogynistic language and arguments themselves, in particular when they trot out the tired trope that feminists are man-hating and sexually-repressed Victorians.
Show this thread -
"Nous sommes aussi suffisamment clairvoyantes pour ne pas confondre drague maladroite et agression sexuelle." Les femmes, peut-être, mais je suis désolée de vous dire que pour certains hommes la différence n'existe pas.
#BalanceTonPorcShow this thread -
Chères Catherine Deneuve, Catherine Millet, @SarahChiche,
@ELevyCauseur, Catherine Robbe-Grillet,@nikitakarachoi, Marie-Laure Bernadac, Brigitte Lahaie, Stéphanie Blake, Ingrid Caven, Gloria Friedmann, Joëlle Losfeld, Marie Sellier, Brigitte Jaques-Wajeman etc etc. Des devoirs.pic.twitter.com/EWAEKx7hE4
Show this thread -
What I hate is this French brand of feminism which says, 'Men will be men, what can you do?' My feminism doesn't heap scorn on men, or pander to this notion that they are controlled by their hormones.
Show this thread -
My feminism recognises that men are intelligent beings not (solely) driven by lust, and they are capable of telling the difference between flirtation and harassment. That they are entirely capable of realising when their attentions are appreciated or reciprocated.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
