This is interesting - and transparency is good - but I wonder how they will choose those 1st 300 journals & the 1000 with 6 months. Unless choice is globally random it risks perpetuating current IF biases and current dominance of journals from large Western commercial publishers.
This will help. "A new ranking system for academic journals measuring their commitment to research transparency will be launched next month -- providing what many believe will be a useful alternative to journal impact scores."https://ihenow.com/2GXlSrX
-
-
-
Good point
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
i’m hopeful but very skeptical. IF hasn’t gone away bc it serves a base psychological need to say one paper is “better” than another. the hypothesis that “research transparency” can compete for that feels weak. it seems moralistic, not realistic... i hope I’m wrong!!
-
Only transparent research can be fully vetted for quality. Therefore transparent research has much higher potential for quality. And transparent research can be built on much more easily, which is what should happen with research, making it higher quality.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Should also be done for: - institutions - funders - countries Give them a ranking to chase...
-
Dog -> ball Institution -> ranking
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
How transparent will the methodology of your ranking be?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.