YouTube obviously owns their platform and can make their own rules separately from tv networks, but I think the more compelling argument you can make is that your content brings people to YouTube, who then watch other videos which generate revenue. That could be seen as grifting
Your logical fallacy is: appeal to authority. Take care. And seriously, take your "support" elsewhere if you don't mind.
-
-
I support your activism. These are important topics that should be discussed and funded. I don’t have to support your ideal monetization of that activity. “Take it or leave it” thinking is a hard doctrine to deprogram... Good luck with your endeavors
-
(1/2) No, you really don't support me. My Reclaimed Voices documentary would never have been made if I hadn't been funded by my patrons to drop everything and spend 2 weeks filming in the Netherlands. I don't owe the world anything.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
