What are you views about Shabarimala 

-
-
Replying to @monteskw
Views as in critique of the judgment or what is to be done now?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cbcnn_Pilid
Critique of the Judgment. What can we do now..... We can only hope one day we can get back our constitution sans the damage done by Western indoctrinated fellows
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @monteskw
Several points. Agree w/ DYC & IM on doing away with the essential practices test. Religious denomination question was a harder one & there are unresolved questions that the plurality did not address.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @monteskw
Don't believe so. She did cite some criticism of the test which I understood to imply some skepticism but didn't go as far as DYC. However, DYC's alternative is fearsome & dangerous.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cbcnn_Pilid
Same para. Such devotion to legislature. Next para, he reads a right into 25(2) which is merely social reform provision for legislature. And then elevates that right to sky highpic.twitter.com/lSeNDuZniS
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @monteskw
After more reflection, I can see the problem here. Suppose, the conflict was avoided by reading 25(2) as an exception solely against 25(1) & subject to other provisions in part III including art. 26, it would have made social reform very difficult. 1/n
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cbcnn_Pilid @monteskw
For e.g., suppose a law were passed to ban female circumcision under 25(2)(b) providing for social reform. Under that constricted reading, it'd automatically exempt Dawoodi Bohras who are a religious denomination under art. 26 even if primarily intended for the community. 2/2
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
It is done with parental consent just as male circumcision & ear/nose piercings. So, is that an issue?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.