Preskoči na sadržaj
Korištenjem servisa na Twitteru pristajete na korištenje kolačića. Twitter i partneri rade globalno te koriste kolačiće za analize, personalizaciju i oglase.

Za najbolje sučelje na Twitteru koristite Microsoft Edge ili instalirajte aplikaciju Twitter iz trgovine Microsoft Store.

  • Naslovnica Naslovnica Naslovnica, trenutna stranica.
  • O Twitteru

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Jezik: Hrvatski
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • Ελληνικά
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Imate račun? Prijava
    Imate račun?
    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?

    Novi ste na Twitteru?
    Registrirajte se
Profil korisnika/ce causalinf
scott cunningham
scott cunningham
scott cunningham
@causalinf

Tweets

scott cunningham

@causalinf

Economist studying crime, mental health, sex work. Wrote “Causal Inference: The Mixtape”. I’m leaving work now swear http://scunning.com/cunningham_mixtape.pdf …

Waco, Texas
scunning.com
Vrijeme pridruživanja: listopad 2011.

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • O Twitteru
  • Centar za pomoć
  • Uvjeti
  • Pravila o privatnosti
  • Imprint
  • Kolačići
  • Informacije o oglasima
Odbaci
Prethodni
Sljedeće

Idite na profil osobe

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @

Odjava

Blokiraj

  • Objavi Tweet s lokacijom

    U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više

    Vaši popisi

    Izradi novi popis


    Manje od 100 znakova, neobavezno

    Privatnost

    Kopiraj vezu u tweet

    Ugradi ovaj Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Dodajte ovaj Tweet na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Dodajte ovaj videozapis na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Hm, došlo je do problema prilikom povezivanja s poslužiteljem.

    Integracijom Twitterova sadržaja u svoje web-mjesto ili aplikaciju prihvaćate Twitterov Ugovor za programere i Pravila za programere.

    Pregled

    Razlog prikaza oglasa

    Prijavi se na Twitter

    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?
    Nemate račun? Registrirajte se »

    Prijavite se na Twitter

    Niste na Twitteru? Registrirajte se, uključite se u stvari koje vas zanimaju, i dobivajte promjene čim se dogode.

    Registrirajte se
    Imate račun? Prijava »

    Dvosmjerni (slanje i primanje) kratki kodovi:

    Država Kod Samo za korisnike
    Sjedinjene Američke Države 40404 (bilo koje)
    Kanada 21212 (bilo koje)
    Ujedinjeno Kraljevstvo 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Irska 51210 Vodafone, O2
    Indija 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonezija 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italija 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » Pogledajte SMS kratke šifre za druge zemlje

    Potvrda

     

    Dobro došli kući!

    Vremenska crta mjesto je na kojem ćete provesti najviše vremena i bez odgode dobivati novosti o svemu što vam je važno.

    Tweetovi vam ne valjaju?

    Prijeđite pokazivačem preko slike profila pa kliknite gumb Pratim da biste prestali pratiti neki račun.

    Kažite mnogo uz malo riječi

    Kada vidite Tweet koji volite, dodirnite srce – to osobi koja ga je napisala daje do znanja da vam se sviđa.

    Proširite glas

    Najbolji je način da podijelite nečiji Tweet s osobama koje vas prate prosljeđivanje. Dodirnite ikonu da biste smjesta poslali.

    Pridruži se razgovoru

    Pomoću odgovora dodajte sve što mislite o nekom tweetu. Pronađite temu koja vam je važna i uključite se.

    Saznajte najnovije vijesti

    Bez odgode pogledajte o čemu ljudi razgovaraju.

    Pratite više onoga što vam se sviđa

    Pratite više računa da biste dobivali novosti o temama do kojih vam je stalo.

    Saznajte što se događa

    Bez odgode pogledajte najnovije razgovore o bilo kojoj temi.

    Ne propustite nijedan aktualni događaj

    Bez odgode pratite kako se razvijaju događaji koje pratite.

    scott cunningham‏ @causalinf 24. sij
    • Prijavi Tweet

    I don’t know if this is a controversial take, an obvious take or both. But I have a position on econometrics curriculum I’d like to verbalize. I believe causal inference should be taught before econometrics, not after, and here’s why. 1/n

    07:08 - 24. sij 2020.
    • 215 proslijeđenih tweetova
    • 1.028 oznaka „sviđa mi se”
    • Steve Landgraf KCL ISPOR Student Chapter Ann Jillian Adona Dr. Lydia Bean Rebecca Boehm Ed Kendall Olanrewaju Yusuff Aayush Khadka Gabrielle Péloquin-Skulski
    215 proslijeđenih tweetova 1.028 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      1. Novi razgovor
      2. scott cunningham‏ @causalinf 24. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        There’s several elements to this argument and I will just go through them in steps. First, there is my marginal product argument. It is my experience that causal inference raises the marginal product of the econometrics professors work, and not the other way around. 2/n

        3 proslijeđena tweeta 61 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      3. scott cunningham‏ @causalinf 24. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Routinely, students who take my class at the end tell me “ah hah! I finally get what we are doing in econometrics!” Now, here’s the thing; it’s debatable that I have helped them better understand econometrics. 2/n

        1 reply 3 proslijeđena tweeta 59 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      4. scott cunningham‏ @causalinf 24. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        But what I have done is giving them a *reason* to interact with that difficult econometrics material as a beginner. And that’s what is currently missing in our training of economics students. Oftentimes, students are exposed to econometrics without useful priors. 3/n

        8 proslijeđenih tweetova 174 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      5. scott cunningham‏ @causalinf 24. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        We think primarily in terms of technical prequels like calculus or a probability class. But then students can not articulate to themselves or each other just what these parameters are they’re estimating or why they should care truly about an estimators properties 4/n

        8 proslijeđenih tweetova 102 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      6. scott cunningham‏ @causalinf 24. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        What I believe they are missing is something to hang their hat on to justify why they should exert so much effort in learning econometrics, and causal inference does that. And here’s my second element to this argument. Causal inference crowds out nothing 5/n

        9 proslijeđenih tweetova 93 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      7. scott cunningham‏ @causalinf 24. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        It’d be different if we were saying “well if they learn to think about econometrics purely in terms of estimating causal effects, then that crowds out this other reason I believe they should be thinking about”, but we aren’t. Students come in blank slates and are often lost 6/n

        1 reply 3 proslijeđena tweeta 43 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      8. scott cunningham‏ @causalinf 24. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        But if they had causal inference first, it becomes a useful crutch to help them through the material. It fills a void rather than replacing some other crutch. Many students just do not understand at a deep level why they are doing any of that; they learn why late or never 7/n

        1 reply 5 proslijeđenih tweetova 78 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      9. scott cunningham‏ @causalinf 24. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        But another reason I think to do causal inference first is I think insofar as it raises the marginal product of econometricians, then it actually could raise demand for econometrics courses. That’s speculative, I get that, but I believe it’s credible. 8/n

        1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 51 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      10. scott cunningham‏ @causalinf 24. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        What I have seen is exposure to potential outcomes, DAGs, and these designs empowers students - honestly, much like elementary game theory empowers students too. They begin to think questions are within their reach. They develop optimism inside themselves, hope, confidence. 9/n

        1 reply 5 proslijeđenih tweetova 105 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      11. scott cunningham‏ @causalinf 24. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        But they know they need more. I suspect we pull the marginal economist back on the track if we could have causal inference come first, and if we could, then econometricians gain bc their classes fill just slightly more. May sound optimistic but I believe it. 10/n

        2 proslijeđena tweeta 41 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      12. scott cunningham‏ @causalinf 24. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        And what that means is a few things. One, can help with retention. Two, can help with excitement. Three, can help more generally with all our course offerings to handle the massive shift towards empirical work within the profession. 11/n

        5 proslijeđenih tweetova 42 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      13. scott cunningham‏ @causalinf 24. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        If causal inference is brought early, even mandatory, then it provides a very basic worldview that enhances every other faculty’s micro offerings so that they can take certain concepts for granted. And that’s huge bc you want them to know DD before they take labor. 12/n

        1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 41 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      14. scott cunningham‏ @causalinf 24. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        I am not in the camp that causal inference is a substitute for econometrics. I believe it is a compliment. But more to my argument, I believe pedagogically it will be its best complement to that if you teach it first. You make causal inference the *prerequesite*. 13/n

        2 proslijeđena tweeta 45 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      15. scott cunningham‏ @causalinf 24. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        I think we have a perfectly good useable model of that course in my causal inference Mixtape and my workshops and class, which is really just a distillation of how labor economists have been thinking for decades, with some Cunningham quirks. 14/n

        1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 32 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      16. scott cunningham‏ @causalinf 24. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        First, you go all in on potential outcomes. ALL IN. I mean, deep. You go through the history of thought on causal inference and how counterfactuals seems to be what humans have converged on to think about causality. You tell stories and a lot of them. 15/n

        6 proslijeđenih tweetova 54 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      17. scott cunningham‏ @causalinf 24. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Then you dig into the notation, but unlike @autoregress , you do it correctly with Y^0 and Y^1. Convince them it’s simple and in the right hands has become able to move mountains. Then you do DAGs. I will die on that hill pedagogically bc I’ve seen it: kids love DAGs. 16/n

        5 proslijeđenih tweetova 58 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      18. scott cunningham‏ @causalinf 24. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Watch their face when you explain IV inside DAGs and contrast that with some counterfactual pedagogy. The alternative is less effective in the mode. They like learning these words, and working through the do calculus. Can’t we just throw kids a bone sometimes? 17/n

        2 proslijeđena tweeta 34 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      19. scott cunningham‏ @causalinf 24. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        And then you do all the canonical designs, with lots of papers, and lots of coding intensive replications. And that constitutes the first course in a micro sequence. And the reason is, all contemporary micro either is all about that, or it’s heavily in conversation with it 18/n

        2 proslijeđena tweeta 29 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      20. scott cunningham‏ @causalinf 24. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        So in conclusion, I think causal inference as I teach it (which sounds more arrogant than I intend it to sound) should be the paradigm for our curriculum at the undergraduate level, and absolutely at grad level. Even if just strategically, you should consider it. 19/n

        2 proslijeđena tweeta 35 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      21. scott cunningham‏ @causalinf 24. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        In the right hands, used properly, a causal inference class brought in early can energize a students mind and heart. It saves her a lot of wasted time - even avoiding major errors that can be nearly impossible to push them off of later. 20/n

        1 reply 5 proslijeđenih tweetova 36 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      22. scott cunningham‏ @causalinf 24. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        So I am firmly in the camp that we should build statistical inference on top of causal inference and not the other way around, even if in the students longrun, she completely ignores causal inference and goes her own separate way. 21/n

        1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 35 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      23. scott cunningham‏ @causalinf 24. sij
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Causal inference as the base is like a surge that raises all ships. Again, either a controversial take that will get me ratioed or so obvious that it doesn’t even merit feedback, but I wanted to share my beliefs about curriculum. 22/n

        15 replies 2 proslijeđena tweeta 42 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      24. Kraj razgovora

    Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

    Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

      Sponzorirani tweet

      false

      • © 2020 Twitter
      • O Twitteru
      • Centar za pomoć
      • Uvjeti
      • Pravila o privatnosti
      • Imprint
      • Kolačići
      • Informacije o oglasima