I don’t blame you for thinking that way, but this lawsuit, especially if it goes Vic’s way, might serve as a good lesson for all of us (myself included). Our bar for thinking somebody is scum should be way higher than what’s conventionally accepted as true on Twitter.
-
-
Replying to @canceledyy @EmilyChan556 and
Those numbers sound bad, but if you went through them one by one (as they’ll do in court) I strongly doubt many of them will rise above “well that was awkward.” That’s the problem the defendants now face - it’s not one instance that has to be harassment/assault, it’s all of them
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @canceledyy @J_Weenus and
No he’ll have to prove 100/100. 10/100 still equals defamation and is still chargeable. 99/100 is still defamation. Like I said, it’s not a criminal case.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @canceledyy @J_Weenus and
No you’re disgusting because all these should have been done in a criminal case A LONG TIME AGO. It’s a civil case so whatever they say don’t matter one bit. The criminal case will determine the severity of those “crimes”, not that one.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jessspeed49 @canceledyy and
The 100 women case is just to prove that 100 women accused him of sexual assault, not to prove if it’s true or not. Get your facts straight.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
He fails so hard and I love it lol
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.