Because you made assertions with a material impact on someone’s life. You’re welcome to think Vic’s a scumbag personally, but if you have any logical consistency you’d want some kind of provable sequence of events if you think he deserves having his life ruined.
-
-
Replying to @canceledyy @EmilyChan556 and
I don’t blame you for thinking that way, but this lawsuit, especially if it goes Vic’s way, might serve as a good lesson for all of us (myself included). Our bar for thinking somebody is scum should be way higher than what’s conventionally accepted as true on Twitter.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @canceledyy @EmilyChan556 and
Those numbers sound bad, but if you went through them one by one (as they’ll do in court) I strongly doubt many of them will rise above “well that was awkward.” That’s the problem the defendants now face - it’s not one instance that has to be harassment/assault, it’s all of them
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @canceledyy @EmilyChan556 and
But what if those ten are “hey he was kind of weird?” If that’s the highest bar they can pass, is that worth ruining a man’s livelihood? I feel like there’s a lot of real world context being lost here because we’re on Twitter - on both sides. It’s frightening.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @canceledyy @J_Weenus and
True. But when Funimation said they do not support harassment, and then people started to brigade and harass, then they cannot claim harassment when people start to question and counter their narrative.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Let's not play dumb, you know exactly who, keep it above board.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.