Some people are once again reacting to one critic liking a game less than other critics as if it’s a sign that’s something wrong. Shouldn’t part of the benefit of multiple review outlets be that we get multiple valid perspectives on a game?
I don't think there's "one right way" to do it. Some shooter expert talking about Fortnite might have qualms about how the shooting compares with other games but if another critic disregards that entirely to talk about tone, setting, other mechanics, etc., that's fine by me.
-
-
I've written at length about what I want from the critical landscape. But you can rest assured that you are in the dominant, mainstream position here, and that the status quo shows no indication of changing any time soon, so my attitude is no threat.https://medium.com/@carolynpetit/ruthless-individuality-criticisms-past-and-hopefully-its-future-d1ffbf3bb2c8 …
-
I think we disagree less than you might expect. My issue is really focused on this one very common review. It isn't novel to get someone who thinks musou is a bad genre to review it. Getting people who don't like a Japanese niche genre to review it is very common, for decades.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.