I routinely hear ppl say things like "this game is bad but I like it" & "this game is bad but fun" & though I know this way of thinking is so deeply ingrained as to be nigh unchangeable I philosophically object to it & the underlying notion of game quality as something objective.
-
Show this thread
-
It seems to me that these folks often have to bend over backwards trying to explain that although they feel deep affection for a game, they still recognize that it is, of course, bad, as we can all recognize just by looking at it. It is objectively bad.
2 replies 0 retweets 16 likesShow this thread -
IMO: If a game is fun, or if you like it for whatever reason, if you find it strangely beautiful or captivating or whatever, it's good, no matter how janky it is. If it's "polished" but dull, it's bad, no matter how refined it is.
3 replies 3 retweets 25 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @carolynmichelle
I can see cases where this breaks down, though, and it might be because "good" and "bad" simply don't capture enough. For example, I watched Death Note recently and found it both entertaining to watch and thematically abhorrent.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Video_Game_King
Of course, games too can be deeply complex and multifaceted, simultaneously good and bad. See my piece on The Last of Us Part II, I definitely understand this.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
This thread is more about situations such as people liking games that are "janky" while believing that they are still objectively bad.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.