In other words, most of us would say that a game like The Last of Us (a game that, for the record, I like) succeeds at what it sets out to do. But what about seriously examining/interrogating the value of what it's doing? Why is what it's doing just taken as inherently good?(2/3)
-
-
Show this thread
-
Games often get good review scores for doing the things we expect them to do. But we could use a lot more interrogation of why we think it's so great when fairly by-the-numbers AAA games do the things that we expect them to do. We could use more voices saying, "So what?" (3/3)
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.