As "discourse," this shit is tired, but man, there are still SO MANY people, and they are out in droves at the moment, who try to defend objectified female characters as "sexual," and frame criticism of them as being against "sexual expression." This remains as absurd as ever.
It's absolutely okay. This is part of an ongoing conversation and I 100% don't think there's anything wrong with any of that. I loved those games and that character in my own way too.
-
-
What I'm responding to specifically here is the argument some--particularly men who clearly want the sexual objectification of women to remain routine in games—are making that to criticize her is to criticize female sexual expression itself.
-
Yeah I think our complexity here is intent. And where one man’s sexual object is a woman’s sexual revolutionary. I don’t disagree that we need more representation but I’d make the argument that we can have both. And intent matters even if it’s hard to identify.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.