Like, I was disappointed in Breath of the Wild. Opaque systems, wild swings in focus and difficulty, inconsistent connections with emergent gameplay, etc. But it would never occur to me to frame that as "critics gave it 90s and I'd have given it 60s"
-
-
Replying to @RowanKaiser @carolynmichelle and
It was that I felt like people, regardless of review scores or YouTube channels or whatever are willing to give Zeldas a free pass that I'm not, and I didn't. Wasn't review scores that had non gaming sites declare it the best since Ocarina of Time, it was people loving Zelda.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RowanKaiser @carolynmichelle and
When I've read his stuff I get the idea that he thinks better application of scoring would solve the problem which is utterly baffling to me
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RowanKaiser @carolynmichelle and
Speaking as a (mostly) former reviewer, I see a lot of conversations that can and should be had about systemic issues that undermine the process. “These fools do not agree with the opinions of me, the objectively correct contrarian” is not one of those conversations.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @gamespite @RowanKaiser and
Carolyn, I respect that you see value in his writing! For my part, though, I always find myself initially intrigued when I begin reading one of his pieces, but he always lands at the conclusion that reviews are bad because people like or value things he doesn’t. It’s frustrating.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @gamespite @RowanKaiser and
I'm not Tevis, I can't speak for him and I shouldn't try. But I don't see him saying "Why don't you agree with me about X game?" Rather, I see him saying, "Why do you all always agree with each other?" And I think it's a very important question.
4 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @carolynmichelle @gamespite and
We don't though. Smart folks, at big sites and small ones, wrote about issues with games like Red Dead and GoW. The argument arises out of partially out of a lack of literacy, which makes it a shaky argument.
3 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
YOURE TOO DAMN SUBJECTIVE, CAPOZZOLI! YOU’RE A LOOSE CANNON! IN THIS PRECINCT WE FO THINGS BY THE BOOK!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.