why won't we, though. that's the part that guts me.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
$717b on war, yet zero for states to protect voting systems
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But if you spend $717B on more people dying, why would you spend money on less people dying?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You can't. You forget"War is good for business", Ferengi Rules of Acquisition
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We have to have our terrible inefficent graft filled american jobs program
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Does anyone here know why we spend that much or can all you guys do so complain
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No! All the branches of military need these jets that no one wants, no one asked for, and dont work! Shoosh commie!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You could, but that would just lead to higher prices and lower quality in the long run, hurting the very people you're trying to help. We need to be cutting back, not spending more.
-
Actually the quality would rise but then so would the minimum standards of education of jobs thus making those jobs harder to get for most people.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.