Let me fix that for you: She correctly identified Carl Benjamin attempting to harass her, turned the tables on him and exposed him for a whiny manbaby he is. But thanks for playing.
-
-
Replying to @RvEijndhoven @anitasarkeesian and
Let me help you. No, they weren't causing a disturbance.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @TheAKirschProj @RvEijndhoven and
lol it was obviously a deliberate act of intimidation and disturbance, meant to throw off the target. we know you people are smart enough to understand this, you just won't admit it. if playing dumb is how you want to keep going about this, welp, fine, keep looking dumb.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Um. Come on. They wanted to intimidate her and fuck with her in a way that would allow them to deny that they were doing it. Do you know what “plausible deniability” is?https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/07/04/plausible-deniability-the-drug-that-president-trump-cant-stop-abusing/ …
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Totally, and there's no reason to believe Trump is a white supremacist.

1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
If your comprehension is so bad that you can't make sense of why I linked to that article about Trump then there's truly no point in us carrying on a conversation. Oh and yeah, ya got me, I'm totally accepting that I'm in the wrong here. You read me loud and clear.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
LOL this conversation is less productive than talking to a brick wall. I'm "forfeiting" because it's tiresome and a waste of everyone's time and neither of us is ever going to get anywhere, and because you are not entitled to my time and attention.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.