Show me an antivaxer “analysis” of a vaccine safety study claiming to “show how it’s unscientific and inadequate,” and I’ll show you how that antivaxer’s criticisms are based on pseudoscience, bad science, bad reasoning, and ignorance.
https://twitter.com/capital744/status/1175580492332261376 …
An open discussion of science does not include the label of anti-Vaxxer. I’m pro vaccine safety and no safety is being studied. This is why you’re scared to post your favorite clinical safety study (they don’t exist)
-
-
Own your position. You're an anti vaxer.
-
Own your position. You worship at the alter of pharmaceutical mysticism.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How many studies would you like? I could provide links to some of the vaccine safety studies I've blogged about over the last 15 years or so.

-
Could you post one? I have a family member that continuously says that a comprehensive study of the schedule doesn’t exist.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I already did and you admitted you couldn’t access it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No education or credentials (cue “school of life” foolishness), an anti-science position, and too weak/passive to just own his ignorance.
-
Try me. Test your intelligence against mine. I’m superior in my ability to analyze studies from the church of pharmaceutical mysticism. I’m not a believer. There are no valid safety studies. Prove me wrong.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.