I’m unable to have same respect for your comments, which feel of hidden agenda, lean toward insult, and derail/confuse the focus. Tactics of recallers. Recall of elected DA would cost millions. If you live in SF I encourage you to learn and care about this issue. #StandWithChesa
-
-
Replying to @cameronshanti3 @antemaal and
Sorry you feel that way. As stated, I do not have a preference on the Chesa recall one way or the other. I think there have been too many extenuating circumstances for his policies to have a clear read. I do note only one side has been committing criminal voter interference tho.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Spider sense tells me you want to argue yet another point so you can feel good about winning . . . or just arguing. Maybe is just the arguing that folks get addicted to. Sincerity is what’s lacking here.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cameronshanti3 @antemaal and
I don't think it's fair to say I lack sincerity. I was very open about how I want the collective us to be able to disagree respectfully. For that to happen we need to argue. Argument *can* be constructive when done respectfully, it just seems like people have forgotten how.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
For me your comments cling to argument. There’s some snarky baiting thrown in to fuel argument. Argument is not the same as respectful discussion or creative solution. Especially on Twitter.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cameronshanti3 @antemaal and
You're correct. It is argument bait. Because as I said, I want us to reach a place where we can argue respectfully and be okay with our disagreement. It sounds like you want everyone to agree, and to agree with what you believe. I wish you the best of luck in that endeavor.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Baiting has no place in clear respectful discussion aimed at solving a collective problem. Baiting is manipulative, controlling, confusing, insincere. Wishing me well for a shady quality you alone assign me is snarky insincerity. You maintain illusion of control in interaction.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cameronshanti3 @antemaal and
buddythebird ↙️ ↙️ ↙️ Retweeted Cameron
And you were relinquishing control in this comment, were you?https://twitter.com/cameronshanti3/status/1442910586820390913?t=g1mE1DCLvmI2WoP7gblbQw&s=19 …
buddythebird ↙️ ↙️ ↙️ added,
Cameron @cameronshanti3Replying to @chesaboudin @LorenaAD80Thank you@chesaboudin and@lorenagonzalez! Reactionary replies here show that recallers are fine with stealing wages from workers - a telling clue this recall is a privileged effort. SF elected reform. We continue to#StandWithElectedDAChesa#StandWithChesa1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I’m very glad I called out the unthoughtful nature of recaller replies to initial thread. I feel my honesty and insight too. Crimes against workers don’t matter as much to you, for ex., as arguing a fabricated point about DA’s policies on Twitter. Watch the vid.
#StandWithChesa1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cameronshanti3 @antemaal and
You know nothing about my opinions on wage theft. I work in an industry where it is common and have spent my career protecting those around and under me from it, as well as educating them about it. I do think rape and vehicular manslaughter are magnitudes worse tho.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
To be honest, in truth you know nothing about the difference in sentencing a wage theft crime and manslaughter under this bill. You’ve imagined that wage theft would incur as much or more sentencing, then proceeded to bait and argue that point aggressively.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.