Oh I see, I mentioned reactionary replies. The replies are reactionary, my opinion, including yours, bc they heighten argument rather than discussion. Your question belies your anger at something else entirely.
-
-
Replying to @cameronshanti3 @antemaal and
The only thing I am angry at are hypocrites. I want us to be able to respectfully disagree w/o it meaning someone's human rights or humanity are violated.. I do appreciate that most of your comments (except the first) did seem focused on education rather than instigation.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I’m unable to have same respect for your comments, which feel of hidden agenda, lean toward insult, and derail/confuse the focus. Tactics of recallers. Recall of elected DA would cost millions. If you live in SF I encourage you to learn and care about this issue.
#StandWithChesa1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cameronshanti3 @antemaal and
Sorry you feel that way. As stated, I do not have a preference on the Chesa recall one way or the other. I think there have been too many extenuating circumstances for his policies to have a clear read. I do note only one side has been committing criminal voter interference tho.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Spider sense tells me you want to argue yet another point so you can feel good about winning . . . or just arguing. Maybe is just the arguing that folks get addicted to. Sincerity is what’s lacking here.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cameronshanti3 @antemaal and
I don't think it's fair to say I lack sincerity. I was very open about how I want the collective us to be able to disagree respectfully. For that to happen we need to argue. Argument *can* be constructive when done respectfully, it just seems like people have forgotten how.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
For me your comments cling to argument. There’s some snarky baiting thrown in to fuel argument. Argument is not the same as respectful discussion or creative solution. Especially on Twitter.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cameronshanti3 @antemaal and
You're correct. It is argument bait. Because as I said, I want us to reach a place where we can argue respectfully and be okay with our disagreement. It sounds like you want everyone to agree, and to agree with what you believe. I wish you the best of luck in that endeavor.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Baiting has no place in clear respectful discussion aimed at solving a collective problem. Baiting is manipulative, controlling, confusing, insincere. Wishing me well for a shady quality you alone assign me is snarky insincerity. You maintain illusion of control in interaction.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cameronshanti3 @antemaal and
buddythebird ↙️ ↙️ ↙️ Retweeted Cameron
And you were relinquishing control in this comment, were you?https://twitter.com/cameronshanti3/status/1442910586820390913?t=g1mE1DCLvmI2WoP7gblbQw&s=19 …
buddythebird ↙️ ↙️ ↙️ added,
Cameron @cameronshanti3Replying to @chesaboudin @LorenaAD80Thank you@chesaboudin and@lorenagonzalez! Reactionary replies here show that recallers are fine with stealing wages from workers - a telling clue this recall is a privileged effort. SF elected reform. We continue to#StandWithElectedDAChesa#StandWithChesa1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I’m very glad I called out the unthoughtful nature of recaller replies to initial thread. I feel my honesty and insight too. Crimes against workers don’t matter as much to you, for ex., as arguing a fabricated point about DA’s policies on Twitter. Watch the vid. #StandWithChesa
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.