I’ve answered your question to ME in a reply, didn’t call you reactionary. Possibly you’re lumping all Chesa supporters as one person. If your question is sincere you might get better educated outside of twiiter. It’s good to make a sincere effort.
-
-
Replying to @cameronshanti3 @antemaal and
Ironic you would be upset about lumping people into a category and treating them as one person when that is exactly what you did in your original comment.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Oh I see, I mentioned reactionary replies. The replies are reactionary, my opinion, including yours, bc they heighten argument rather than discussion. Your question belies your anger at something else entirely.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cameronshanti3 @antemaal and
The only thing I am angry at are hypocrites. I want us to be able to respectfully disagree w/o it meaning someone's human rights or humanity are violated.. I do appreciate that most of your comments (except the first) did seem focused on education rather than instigation.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I’m unable to have same respect for your comments, which feel of hidden agenda, lean toward insult, and derail/confuse the focus. Tactics of recallers. Recall of elected DA would cost millions. If you live in SF I encourage you to learn and care about this issue.
#StandWithChesa1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cameronshanti3 @antemaal and
Sorry you feel that way. As stated, I do not have a preference on the Chesa recall one way or the other. I think there have been too many extenuating circumstances for his policies to have a clear read. I do note only one side has been committing criminal voter interference tho.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Spider sense tells me you want to argue yet another point so you can feel good about winning . . . or just arguing. Maybe is just the arguing that folks get addicted to. Sincerity is what’s lacking here.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cameronshanti3 @antemaal and
I don't think it's fair to say I lack sincerity. I was very open about how I want the collective us to be able to disagree respectfully. For that to happen we need to argue. Argument *can* be constructive when done respectfully, it just seems like people have forgotten how.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
For me your comments cling to argument. There’s some snarky baiting thrown in to fuel argument. Argument is not the same as respectful discussion or creative solution. Especially on Twitter.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cameronshanti3 @antemaal and
You're correct. It is argument bait. Because as I said, I want us to reach a place where we can argue respectfully and be okay with our disagreement. It sounds like you want everyone to agree, and to agree with what you believe. I wish you the best of luck in that endeavor.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Baiting has no place in clear respectful discussion aimed at solving a collective problem. Baiting is manipulative, controlling, confusing, insincere. Wishing me well for a shady quality you alone assign me is snarky insincerity. You maintain illusion of control in interaction.
-
-
Replying to @cameronshanti3 @antemaal and
I think the problem that needs to be solved is that we have forgotten how to respectfully disagree. We don't need to solve everything. We just need to stop resorting to violence when we do disagree. Baiting only works if you desire the bait. You can always walk away. Don't bite.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.