Partisanship is not a bad thing. All of us are partisans in one way or another. The discipline and wisdom to suspend one’s partisanship is what is required of a justice. One hopes Kavanaugh can do it. Scalia couldn’t.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's high time now the executive shouldn't be involved at all in appointment of judges so as to avoid partisan judges and maintain the spirit of the independence. The executive should not cherrypick judges. No more shoulder appointments to SCOTUS
-
I disagree slightly. A president wins office through the vote of the people, and so his appointments are a reflection of that vote. That is part of their campaign promise.
-
Justice will be sacrificed at the altar of the President and whole concept of rule of law will be vilified.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thank you
@camanpour for introducing me to@McCormickProf. This was my favorite episode of your program. It’s encouraging to see real dialogue after weeks of hesterical lunacy.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As along former frat boys and former corporate lawyers out number the women anti people judgements continue.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The S.C. determines constitutionality of legislation. It does not determine policy. Legislators need to write better laws& not rely on lower courts to push things http://thru.It does then give the appearance that the SC is making policy,when just doing their jobs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why do people feel the Court is partisan? Can't the justices just interpret the Constitution differently instead of from a political point of view Only politicians think this way and convince others it's so
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Two illegitimate processes to place
#NeilGorsuch**** and#BrettKavanaugh**** turned The Supreme Court to a more extreme right Political Court.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Completely agree.....SCOTUS is the arbiter of existing laws made by Congress.... My question is why they would choose to rule on those specific "flash point" cases as the partisans hoped they would?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not like this. This situation is, or should be, quite extraordinary. Ultimately, The People, the majority of whom are decent, kind and caring of fellow Americans, will speak - - - or the country will fall into the abyss of Greed and Corruption.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
B/C some prefer to have 5 unelected judges discover broad rights then force them on society. Legislators abdicate responsibilities, seeing it’s easier to mandate support rather than build it. Any wonder it’s become political?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the kleptocracy is in full control! corporations are people!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You're wrong. The
@USSupremeCourt does NOT make the final decision in issues. They APPLY THE LAW. The law is the U.S. Constitution, and laws passed by Congress or the states. Not by them. Yes, as long as there's judicial activism we will be struggling to stop it.@BrettKavanaughThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
