Rpt says £46/MWh in old money (£2012), which is directly comparable to the Hinkley price…
-
-
-
So more than double in that case.
-
yup (assuming, pretty safely, that Sizewell C doesn't happen, triggering reduction to £89.50)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Does that Hinckley price include full decommissioning costs?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can't make a new generation of trident warheads from Wind power though can ya? And that's what it's all about
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why make rUK pay 92% of £50/MWh for intermittency which then requires backup when nuclear can do it for £30/MWh http://data.parliament.uk/WrittenEvidence/CommitteeEvidence.svc/EvidenceDocument/Energy%20and%20Climate%20Change/Energy%20Revolution/written/33336.html …
#SNPThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Now 20years without warming - if we stopped following the pseudo-science it'd cost us nothing at all.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hinckley's price is index linked so even though no ground has been broken it's now over £100mw/h.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Could" is the operative word
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yep and Nuclear is uninsurable
-
i wouldn't put my money in wind either.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.