@calestous @paulakahumbu I missed this poll, but I strongly oppose the burn
-
-
-
@calestous@paulakahumbu I am for#to_ban_and_not_to_burn. Obviously the first didn't work. KWS should use the ivory for a memorial instead. -
@barugahara I too prefer a memorial to ashes. I like fires by the but not using the remains of the brutally murdered@paulakahumbu
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@calestous@paulakahumbu that's a tough question. Will it put a serious dent in the global ivory trade? Probably not. -
@taiwoross Re-read the article@paulakahumbu -
@calestous@paulakahumbu why not offshore wind farms?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@calestous Why couldn't the ivory be used in a dedicated endangered species museum as testimony to wildlife crime..education@paulakahumbu -
Burning ivory benefits no one. We would rather sell them and pump the money into Anti-poaching
@paintsandsings@calestous@paulakahumbu -
Interesting idea
@Gichungwa254: Burning ivory benefits no one. Sell & pump money into Anti-poaching@paintsandsings@calestous@paulakahumbu
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@calestous@paulakahumbu Anything that breaks this trade is good by me. Key to stopping it completely is destroying demand.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@calestous@paulakahumbu Stupid decision, the blood diamond when they are discovered were they incinerated?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@calestous@paulakahumbu A museum would have worked magic unfortunately that's ash nowThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.