So I've now read the whole review article here: http://www.nature.com/articles/nplants2015221 … On balance, it is a very useful review of the organic literature.
-
-
Replying to @WyoWeeds
It presents both the good and the bad of organic & 'conventional' production (though without ever really defining what conventional is).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @WyoWeeds
For example, it very clearly states that organic is 'better' with respect to some outcomes per unit area, but 'worse' per unit production.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @WyoWeeds
The biggest deficiency, in my opinion, is that it never really reconciles that issue in their call for more organic production.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @WyoWeeds
They also acknowledge data deficiencies regarding things like wellbeing. But then just assume that wellbeing would be better in organic.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.