@calestous @statnews you guys researchers on theories it doesn't help or change anything
-
-
-
-
@calestous@statnews will our leaders read this, sorry am hash but it's the frustrations,
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@calestous@statnews the anonymity should only go so far. Say keep the anonymity for the first year. There's pride of association... -
@kimaniden@calestous@statnews Anonymity can help.Peer review rings are real guaranteeing publication for known members.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Long time issue of mind. I think anonymous peer review leads to inattentive reviews.
@calestoushttps://twitter.com/nuclear94/status/157823453540519936 … -
There is currently no hit to the scientific reputation of a reviewer for letting a bad paper through.
@calestoushttps://twitter.com/nuclear94/status/264292849523240960 … -
@nuclear94 Almost all discussion of anonymous PR misses the necessity for it at times thus 'solutions' irrelevant@mtobis@calestous -
@nuclear94 To whit - anonymity greatly reduces resentment to valid criticism in a community.@mtobis@calestous -
@ClimateOfGavin@mtobis@calestous and increases resentment of idiotic criticism in a community. -
@nuclear94 But that resentment is diffuse, not personal. And can be tempered by good editors.@mtobis@calestous -
@ClimateOfGavin@mtobis@calestous it is not diffuse. I can identify most of the people who review me. Writing styles. - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
.
@calestous@statnews This is the information age. No more anonymity. For the people or the governments.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@calestous@statnews There's a strong case for anonymity in many areas.It creates the level playing field many yearn for & stops favouritismThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@calestous@statnews good reason to be anonymous......https://twitter.com/InnovaCJ/status/685260244629483520 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@calestous@statnews no. they can be, but shouldn't have to be.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@calestous@statnews in a world of bias,yes.But it won't cure bias nor develop intellectual property /preserve history -
@calestous@statnews it enshrines the right to be forgotten as it also justifies pseudonymity aka -
@calestous@statnews focus on the message and not the messenger
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.