@calestous @sydnets Eliminate biomass-burning plant, use ultra-low emission nuclear. Grow trees for long-lived lumber. Bury wood waste
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@calestous Will this really work? Quick calculation suggests it'll need ~1 million hectares of land for growing trees. That's just silly -
@JamesKennedyEDU@calestous right, the trouble is not with the concept, but with the scale requiered - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@calestous@TACJ Burning trees isn't carbon neutral, nor is carbon capture tech. This instead of wind, solar and wave power? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@calestous seems an awful lot of effort to appease the anti-nuclear luddites. Still cool, but seriously...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@calestous each time they harvest forest it would certainly take long to regenerate meaning they to put a lot more hectares to sustainThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@calestous@6point626 storing emissions in an aquifer. Probably not a good idea.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@calestous @BBCLerato the cost of it out of reach for the developing world economies. We should build such.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@calestous Will earthquake or deep well for irrigation of aquifer release the CO2?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.